Leeds City Council sorry for ‘drift’ in taking action over ‘untidy’ cricket club land

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now
Leeds City Council has apologised for allowing enforcement action against the owner of a much-loved former community cricket pitch to “drift”.

An independent report by the Local Government Ombudsman said the council had “failed to actively pursue” improvements to the old Highbury Cricket Club ground in Meanwood, on occasions between 2018 and 2022.

It followed complaints about the condition of the land, which a community group has been desperately trying to restore to public use for several years.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The ground, off Stone Mill Lane, ceased being used for cricket in 2004, having been part of the Highbury Works Tannery which closed in the 1990s.

An independent report by the Local Government Ombudsman said the council had “failed to actively pursue” improvements to the old Highbury Cricket Club ground.An independent report by the Local Government Ombudsman said the council had “failed to actively pursue” improvements to the old Highbury Cricket Club ground.
An independent report by the Local Government Ombudsman said the council had “failed to actively pursue” improvements to the old Highbury Cricket Club ground.

The Ombudman’s report said that the council failed to take any action over the “untidy land” and “dilapidated” old tannery building between February and August 2019, having opened an enforcement case the previous year.

It was also critical of the fact the authority did not visit the site between the end of the first Covid lockdown and April 2021.

The local authority blamed the pandemic for the delay, but the Ombudsman said social distancing guidelines would have allowed a visit to the outdoor site during that period.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The report said: “I am therefore not persuaded by the council’s position that it was unable to conduct a site visit due to the COVID-19 pandemic until April 2021.

“The council has not shown evidence of it actively pursuing the case from April 2021 onwards.

“I note its comments that the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on its workload but based on the information provided, I consider the council allowed this case to drift and that the failure to actively pursue it amounts to service failure.”

The council closed its enforcement case against the owner in February this year after the requested improvements had been made to the site.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The Ombudsman’s investigation was triggered by a complaint against the council from a member of the public, to whom the authority was told to apologise.

Responding to the report, a spokesperson for the council said it: “We accept and understand the findings in this case, the issues that caused delays with this case, for example staffing issues due to the pandemic, have since been resolved and an apology has been issued to the complainant.”

Related topics: